Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 (Any Size)

LM Studio

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window Varies
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Llama 3.1 (Any Size) by 22 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.1 70B (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Context Window
128K Varies
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~60-64%
Release Date
Jul 2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Hardware limited
Daily Limit
Credit-based Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
70B Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Closed source application
  • Large downloads
  • Hardware dependent performance
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Model Discovery: Built-in search of HuggingFace
  • GGUF Support: Optimized quantized models
  • GPU Offload: Mix CPU/GPU layers

Similar Comparisons