Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
87/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
A-TIERHugging Face Inference
Intelligence Score
82/100
Context Window
128k
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins
With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 82/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Llama 3.2 11B Vision by 5 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
|
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128k |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | Sep 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 300 Requests / hour |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Dependent on global load |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Text
Vision
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 👁️ Vision & Multimodal |
|
Model Size
|
70B | 11B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Flux.1 Dev