Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Mistral AI

Intelligence Score 90/100

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

Commercial/Paid Model

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 90/100 vs 87/100, Mistral Large outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 3 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)	Mistral Large
Context Window	128K	128K
Architecture	Transformer (Open Weight)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~80-84%	~85-87%
Release Date	Jul 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	5,000 RPM
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Based on tier
Capabilities	No specific data	Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	⚡ Fast	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	70B	Undisclosed
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	API key required Limited availability
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	European AI Open weights available Competitive pricing