Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Mixtral 8x7B

A-TIER

Mistral (La Plateforme)

Intelligence Score 86/100
Context Window 32k
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 86/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Mixtral 8x7B by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Mixtral 8x7B
Context Window
128K 32k
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Mixture of Experts (MoE)
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jul 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 1 request/second
Daily Limit
Credit-based -
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
70B 7B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Phone verification required
  • Data training opt-in required
  • 1 request/second rate limit
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Access to Mistral's open-weight models
  • OpenAI-compatible API endpoints
  • Function calling support

Similar Comparisons