Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

DEPRECATED

Requesty

This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.

Intelligence Score 87/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

A-TIER

LLM7.io

Intelligence Score 85/100

Context Window 1M Context

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 85/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Nemotron 3 Nano 30B by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)	Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
Context Window	128K	1M Context
Architecture	Transformer (Open Weight)	Transformer
Est. MMLU Score	~80-84%	~80-84%
Release Date	Jul 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs)	1 req/s, 60/min, 250/hour (free token from dash.llm7.io)
Daily Limit	200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models	100,000 tokens per 24h (free token; may be reduced without notice)
Capabilities	No specific data	No specific data
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	⚡ Fast	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	70B	30B
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	No signup tier is heavily rate-limited (30 RPM) Smaller, less well-known provider — verify uptime before production use
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Works with zero signup OpenAI-compatible endpoint — swap base_url + key No signup required for basic use