Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Yi Large

A-TIER

01.AI

Intelligence Score 86/100
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 86/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Yi Large by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Yi Large
Context Window
128K 32K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jul 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 10,000 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Based on tier
Capabilities
No specific data
Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
70B Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing

Similar Comparisons