Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 8B

Groq

Intelligence Score 78/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Qwen 2.5 72B

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Qwen 2.5 72B Wins

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 78/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Llama 3.1 8B by 13 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 8B
Qwen 2.5 72B
Context Window
14.4k RPD, 6k TPM 32K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~85-87%
Release Date
Jul 2024 Sep-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD 60 RPM
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
8B 72B
Limitations
  • Test
  • Credits are limited ($1)
  • Decentralized nature may vary latency
  • Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Verifiable Inference (verified computing)
  • Low Cost due to decentralized compute
  • Privacy focused

Similar Comparisons

Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct