Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 (Deployable)

Cerebrium

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

GPT-4o

S-TIER

OpenAI

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o outperforms Llama 3.1 (Deployable) by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
GPT-4o
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~85-87%
Release Date
Jul 2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Pay-per-second compute 10,000 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Based on tier
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • $30 is one-time trial credits
  • Requires some DevOps knowledge
  • Cold starts for serverless models
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
Key Strengths
  • Deploy any HuggingFace model
  • Serverless GPU infrastructure
  • Auto-scaling (scale to zero)
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing

Similar Comparisons