Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.1 8B
Groq
Intelligence Score
78/100
Context Window
14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 8B Wins
With an intelligence score of 78/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 8B outperforms Llama 3.1 (Deployable) by 13 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
|
Llama 3.1 8B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~70-74% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Pay-per-second compute | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 8B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct