Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Cloudflare Workers AI
Intelligence Score
75/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct Wins
With an intelligence score of 75/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct outperforms Llama 3.1 (Deployable) by 10 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
|
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~70-74% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | Sep 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Pay-per-second compute | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 10,000 neurons/day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 3B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct