Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
LLaVA 1.5
A-TIERllamafile
Intelligence Score
81/100
Context Window
Local
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
LLaVA 1.5 Wins
With an intelligence score of 81/100 vs 65/100, LLaVA 1.5 outperforms Llama 3.1 (Deployable) by 16 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for LLaVA 1.5.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
|
LLaVA 1.5
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | Local |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Pay-per-second compute | Hardware dependent |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Unlimited |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Vision
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
LLaVA 1.5
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct