Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Qwen3 32B
Groq
Intelligence Score
79/100
Context Window
1k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen3 32B Wins
With an intelligence score of 79/100 vs 65/100, Qwen3 32B outperforms Llama 3.1 (Deployable) by 14 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
|
Qwen3 32B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 1k RPD, 6k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~70-74% |
|
Release Date
|
Jul 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Pay-per-second compute | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 32B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen3 32B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen3 32B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen3 32B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Qwen3 32B
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct