Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.3 70B
S-TIERGroq
Intelligence Score
94/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 12k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.3 70B Wins
With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 91/100, Llama 3.3 70B outperforms Qwen 2.5 72B by 3 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.3 70B
|
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 12k TPM | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~88-91% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
Dec 2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Fast | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
70B | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct