Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 3.3 70B
S-TIERGroq
Intelligence Score
94/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 12k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
A-TIERSambaNova Cloud
Intelligence Score
89/100
Context Window
32k Context
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.3 70B Wins
With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 89/100, Llama 3.3 70B outperforms Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B by 5 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 3.3 70B
|
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 12k TPM | 32k Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~88-91% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
Dec 2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Dependent on credits |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
70B | 32B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct