Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3 8B Instruct

BentoML

Intelligence Score 71/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 8K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Grok 2 Mini

A-TIER

xAI

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

Grok 2 Mini Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 71/100, Grok 2 Mini outperforms Llama 3 8B Instruct by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 2 Mini.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3 8B Instruct
Grok 2 Mini
Context Window
8K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~65-69% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent Varies
Daily Limit
Unlimited Based on tier
Capabilities
No specific data
Streaming
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
8B Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Learning curve for 'Bento' concept
  • Deployment requires cloud knowledge
  • Local serving is just step 1
  • API key required
Key Strengths
  • Unified Model Store
  • Distributed Runner Architecture
  • Deployment Agnostic
  • Fast
  • Efficient
  • Real-time data access

Similar Comparisons

Llama 3 8B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3 8B Instruct
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3 8B Instruct
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Grok 2 Mini
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Grok 2 Mini
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct