Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3 (Local)

Jan.ai

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window System RAM dependent
Pricing Model Free / Open

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Llama 3 (Local) by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3 (Local)
GPT-4o (via routing)
Context Window
System RAM dependent 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Unlimited Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Requires decent hardware (RAM/GPU)
  • Battery drain on laptops
  • Local model quality vs GPT-4
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • One-click Model Downloader
  • Built-in Local API Server
  • GPU Acceleration (NVIDIA/Metal/Vulkan)
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons