Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3 (Local)

Jan.ai

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window System RAM dependent
Pricing Model Free / Open

TinyLlama

llamafile

Intelligence Score 64/100
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3 (Local) Wins

With an intelligence score of 65/100 vs 64/100, Llama 3 (Local) outperforms TinyLlama by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3 (Local)
TinyLlama
Context Window
System RAM dependent Local
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
Unlimited Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires decent hardware (RAM/GPU)
  • Battery drain on laptops
  • Local model quality vs GPT-4
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths
  • One-click Model Downloader
  • Built-in Local API Server
  • GPU Acceleration (NVIDIA/Metal/Vulkan)
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server

Similar Comparisons