Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
A-TIERGroq
Intelligence Score
89/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 72B Wins
With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 89/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Llama 4 Maverick 17B by 2 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
|
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 6k TPM | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2026 (Latest) | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
17B | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct