Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
A-TIERGroq
Intelligence Score
89/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
A-TIERSambaNova Cloud
Intelligence Score
89/100
Context Window
32k Context
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Wins
Equal intelligence scores (89/100), but Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B offers a significantly larger context window.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
|
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 6k TPM | 32k Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
2026 (Latest) | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Dependent on credits |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
17B | 32B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct