Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 4 Scout

A-TIER

Groq

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 1k RPD, 30k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Solar Pro

Upstage

Intelligence Score 77/100
Context Window 32K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 4 Scout Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 77/100, Llama 4 Scout outperforms Solar Pro by 10 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 4 Scout
Solar Pro
Context Window
1k RPD, 30k TPM 32K tokens
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~70-74%
Release Date
2026 (Latest) 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD 60 RPM
Daily Limit
14,400 Requests/Day Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Reasoning
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
âš¡ Very Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Test
  • Credits expire after 3 months
  • Focus on document processing
  • Smaller context window (32k)
Key Strengths
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models
  • Solar Architecture: Depth-Up-Scaling
  • Specialized in OCR and Document Parse
  • Translation capabilities (KO/EN/JA)

Similar Comparisons

Llama 4 Scout
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Solar Pro
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 4 Scout
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Solar Pro
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 4 Scout
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Solar Pro
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Solar Pro
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Solar Pro
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Solar Pro
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Solar Pro
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Solar Pro
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Solar Pro
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct