Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Llama Guard 4 12B
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
14.4k RPD, 15k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 72B Wins
With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 65/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Llama Guard 4 12B by 26 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Qwen 2.5 72B.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Llama Guard 4 12B
|
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
14.4k RPD, 15k TPM | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
12B | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Llama Guard 4 12B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama Guard 4 12B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama Guard 4 12B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct