Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Command R7B (12-2024)

A-TIER

Cohere

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Command R7B (12-2024) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 81/100, Command R7B (12-2024) outperforms LLaVA 1.5 by 6 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
LLaVA 1.5
Command R7B (12-2024)
Context Window
Local 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 20 requests/minute
Daily Limit
Unlimited -
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 7B
Limitations
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
  • Monthly quota shared across all models
  • 1,000 API calls/month on free tier
  • Commercial use restricted on free plan
Key Strengths
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server
  • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) built-in
  • Enterprise-grade models
  • Embeddings and reranking models

Similar Comparisons

LLaVA 1.5
vs
Command R+ (08-2024)
Command R7B (12-2024)
vs
Command R+ (08-2024)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Command R (08-2024)
Command R7B (12-2024)
vs
Command R (08-2024)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Cohere Command R+
Command R7B (12-2024)
vs
Cohere Command R+
Command R7B (12-2024)
vs
Mistral 7B
Command R7B (12-2024)
vs
TinyLlama