Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

GPT-OSS 120B

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 1k RPD, 8k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

LLaVA 1.5 Wins

With an intelligence score of 81/100 vs 65/100, LLaVA 1.5 outperforms GPT-OSS 120B by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for LLaVA 1.5.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
LLaVA 1.5
GPT-OSS 120B
Context Window
Local 1k RPD, 8k TPM
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Unlimited 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 120B
Limitations
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

LLaVA 1.5
vs
Allam 2 7B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Allam 2 7B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Llama 4 Scout
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Whisper Large v3
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Groq Compound
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Groq Compound Mini