Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Phi-4

A-TIER

GitHub Models

Intelligence Score 89/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Phi-4 Wins

With an intelligence score of 89/100 vs 81/100, Phi-4 outperforms LLaVA 1.5 by 8 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
LLaVA 1.5
Phi-4
Context Window
Local 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 Dec 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent Varies by Copilot Tier
Daily Limit
Unlimited Low
Capabilities
Vision
Reasoning
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
  • Restrictive limits
  • Requires GitHub account
  • Rate limits vary by Copilot tier
Key Strengths
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server
  • Prototyping

Similar Comparisons

LLaVA 1.5
vs
Cohere Command R+
Phi-4
vs
Cohere Command R+
LLaVA 1.5
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
Phi-4
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
LLaVA 1.5
vs
GPT-4o
Phi-4
vs
GPT-4o
Phi-4
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Phi-4
vs
Mistral Large (24.11)
Phi-4
vs
Mistral 7B
Phi-4
vs
TinyLlama