Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window Local

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

A-TIER

Replicate

Intelligence Score 84/100

Context Window Image

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 84/100 vs 81/100, stability-ai/sdxl outperforms LLaVA 1.5 by 3 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	LLaVA 1.5	stability-ai/sdxl
Context Window	Local	Image
Architecture	Transformer	Transformer
Est. MMLU Score	~75-79%	~75-79%
Release Date	2024	2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	Hardware dependent	Varies by model
Daily Limit	Unlimited	Credit-based
Capabilities	Vision	No specific data
Performance Tier	B-Tier (Strong)	B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	Undisclosed
Limitations	File sizes are large (contain weights) CLI usage often required Windows requires appending .exe	Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive) Cold starts for less popular models Trial credits are minimal
Key Strengths	Executable weight files (multi-OS) Integrated Web UI OpenAI Compatible API server	Run any public model with an API Fine-tune existing models easily Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models