Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Whisper Large v3

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 7.2k audio-sec/min, 2k RPD
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

LLaVA 1.5 Wins

With an intelligence score of 81/100 vs 65/100, LLaVA 1.5 outperforms Whisper Large v3 by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for LLaVA 1.5.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
LLaVA 1.5
Whisper Large v3
Context Window
Local 7.2k audio-sec/min, 2k RPD
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Unlimited 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
Vision
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

LLaVA 1.5
vs
Allam 2 7B
Whisper Large v3
vs
Allam 2 7B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Whisper Large v3
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Whisper Large v3
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Whisper Large v3
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Whisper Large v3
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Whisper Large v3
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
Whisper Large v3
vs
Groq Compound
Whisper Large v3
vs
Groq Compound Mini
Whisper Large v3
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B