Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

meta/llama-3-70b-instruct

A-TIER

Replicate

Intelligence Score 83/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 8K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

DeepSeek Coder V2

A-TIER

Ollama

Intelligence Score 85/100
Context Window 64K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

DeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

With an intelligence score of 85/100 vs 83/100, DeepSeek Coder V2 outperforms meta/llama-3-70b-instruct by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
DeepSeek Coder V2
Context Window
8K tokens 64K tokens
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model Hardware limited
Daily Limit
Credit-based Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 💻 Code Generation
Model Size
70b Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive)
  • Cold starts for less popular models
  • Trial credits are minimal
  • Depends on your RAM/GPU
  • Laptop fans will spin up
  • Large models (70B+) need heavy hardware
Key Strengths
  • Run any public model with an API
  • Fine-tune existing models easily
  • Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models
  • Local Inference: Data never leaves your device
  • Modelfiles: Script your own system prompts
  • API: Local REST API for app integration

Similar Comparisons