Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

meta/llama-3-70b-instruct

A-TIER

Replicate

Intelligence Score 83/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 8K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 90/100
Context Window 1M
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze) Wins

With an intelligence score of 90/100 vs 83/100, Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze) outperforms meta/llama-3-70b-instruct by 7 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
Context Window
8K tokens 1M
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 Feb-May 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model Varies by model
Daily Limit
Credit-based Token-based daily limits
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
70b ~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive)
  • Cold starts for less popular models
  • Trial credits are minimal
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
Key Strengths
  • Run any public model with an API
  • Fine-tune existing models easily
  • Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace

Similar Comparisons