Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Mistral Nemo

A-TIER

Mistral (La Plateforme)

Intelligence Score 80/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128k
Pricing Model Free / Open

DeepSeek Coder V2

A-TIER

Ollama

Intelligence Score 85/100
Context Window 64K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

DeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

With an intelligence score of 85/100 vs 80/100, DeepSeek Coder V2 outperforms Mistral Nemo by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Mistral Nemo
DeepSeek Coder V2
Context Window
128k 64K tokens
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
1 request/second Hardware limited
Daily Limit
- Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 💻 Code Generation
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Phone verification required
  • Data training opt-in required
  • 1 request/second rate limit
  • Depends on your RAM/GPU
  • Laptop fans will spin up
  • Large models (70B+) need heavy hardware
Key Strengths
  • Access to Mistral's open-weight models
  • OpenAI-compatible API endpoints
  • Function calling support
  • Local Inference: Data never leaves your device
  • Modelfiles: Script your own system prompts
  • API: Local REST API for app integration

Similar Comparisons