Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Mixtral 8x7B Instruct

A-TIER

Friendli AI

Intelligence Score 86/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 405B

S-TIER

Venice.ai

Intelligence Score 91/100
Context Window 128K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 405B Wins

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 86/100, Llama 3.1 405B outperforms Mixtral 8x7B Instruct by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Mixtral 8x7B Instruct
Llama 3.1 405B
Context Window
32K 128K tokens
Architecture
Mixture of Experts (MoE) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 10 RPM (free tier)
Daily Limit
Credit-based Limited daily usage
Capabilities
Multilingual
Reasoning
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast 🐢 Slower (Reasoning)
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
7B 405B
Limitations
  • $10 credit is one-time trial
  • Billing required after credits
  • Limited model selection
  • Free tier has speed/rate limits
  • Pro subscription needed for 405B speed
  • Decentralized network variance
Key Strengths
  • Optimized inference engine (FriendliEngine)
  • OpenAI-compatible API endpoints
  • Enterprise-grade uptime
  • Zero-Knowledge Proofs for privacy
  • Uncensored model options
  • Decentralized compute network

Similar Comparisons