Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

OpenLLM Generic

BentoML

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Varies
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Groq Compound Mini

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Groq Compound Mini Wins

Equal intelligence scores (65/100), but Groq Compound Mini offers a significantly larger context window.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
OpenLLM Generic
Groq Compound Mini
Context Window
Varies 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Unlimited 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Learning curve for 'Bento' concept
  • Deployment requires cloud knowledge
  • Local serving is just step 1
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Unified Model Store
  • Distributed Runner Architecture
  • Deployment Agnostic
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

OpenLLM Generic
vs
Allam 2 7B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Allam 2 7B
OpenLLM Generic
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
OpenLLM Generic
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Whisper Large v3
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Groq Compound
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B