Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

OpenLLM Generic

BentoML

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Varies
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Llama 3.1 8B

Groq

Intelligence Score 78/100
Context Window 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 8B Wins

With an intelligence score of 78/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 8B outperforms OpenLLM Generic by 13 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
OpenLLM Generic
Llama 3.1 8B
Context Window
Varies 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~70-74%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Unlimited 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 8B
Limitations
  • Learning curve for 'Bento' concept
  • Deployment requires cloud knowledge
  • Local serving is just step 1
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Unified Model Store
  • Distributed Runner Architecture
  • Deployment Agnostic
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

OpenLLM Generic
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
OpenLLM Generic
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
OpenLLM Generic
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct