Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
OpenLLM Generic
BentoML
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Varies
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 (Deployable) Wins
Equal intelligence scores (65/100), but Llama 3.1 (Deployable) offers a significantly larger context window.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
OpenLLM Generic
|
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
Varies | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Hardware dependent | Pay-per-second compute |
|
Daily Limit
|
Unlimited | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
OpenLLM Generic
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
OpenLLM Generic
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
OpenLLM Generic
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct