Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

OpenLLM Generic

BentoML

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Varies
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Qwen3 32B

Groq

Intelligence Score 79/100
Context Window 1k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Qwen3 32B Wins

With an intelligence score of 79/100 vs 65/100, Qwen3 32B outperforms OpenLLM Generic by 14 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
OpenLLM Generic
Qwen3 32B
Context Window
Varies 1k RPD, 6k TPM
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~70-74%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Unlimited 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 32B
Limitations
  • Learning curve for 'Bento' concept
  • Deployment requires cloud knowledge
  • Local serving is just step 1
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Unified Model Store
  • Distributed Runner Architecture
  • Deployment Agnostic
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

OpenLLM Generic
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
OpenLLM Generic
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 4 Scout
OpenLLM Generic
vs
Whisper Large v3
Qwen3 32B
vs
Whisper Large v3
Qwen3 32B
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
Qwen3 32B
vs
Groq Compound
Qwen3 32B
vs
Groq Compound Mini
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
Qwen3 32B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905