Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Phi-2
Cloudflare Workers AI
Intelligence Score
70/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
DeepSeek-R1
S-TIERChutes.ai
Intelligence Score
97/100
Context Window
64K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
DeepSeek-R1 Wins
With an intelligence score of 97/100 vs 70/100, DeepSeek-R1 outperforms Phi-2 by 27 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek-R1.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Phi-2
|
DeepSeek-R1
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2K | 64K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Dense Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~65-69% | ~92-95% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jan 2025 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by model | Varies (community capacity) |
|
Daily Limit
|
10,000 neurons/day | Subject to availability |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | 🐢 Slower (Reasoning) |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 🧠 Complex Reasoning |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Phi-2
vs
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Phi-2
vs
Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2
Phi-2
vs
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
DeepSeek-R1
vs
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct