Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Phi-2
Cloudflare Workers AI
Intelligence Score
70/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Phi-2 Wins
With an intelligence score of 70/100 vs 65/100, Phi-2 outperforms Groq Compound by 5 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Phi-2
|
Groq Compound
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2K | 250 RPD, 70k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~65-69% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by model | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
10,000 neurons/day | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Phi-2
vs
Allam 2 7B
Groq Compound
vs
Allam 2 7B
Phi-2
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Phi-2
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Groq Compound
vs
Whisper Large v3
Groq Compound
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
Groq Compound
vs
Groq Compound Mini
Groq Compound
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B