Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Phi-3.5 Mini
Ollama
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K tokens
Pricing Model
Free / Open
DeepSeek Coder V2
A-TIEROllama
Intelligence Score
85/100
Context Window
64K tokens
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
DeepSeek Coder V2 Wins
With an intelligence score of 85/100 vs 65/100, DeepSeek Coder V2 outperforms Phi-3.5 Mini by 20 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek Coder V2.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Phi-3.5 Mini
|
DeepSeek Coder V2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K tokens | 64K tokens |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Dense Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Hardware limited | Hardware limited |
|
Daily Limit
|
Unlimited | Unlimited |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
âš¡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Phi-3.5 Mini
vs
Gemma 2 9B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Gemma 2 9B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Mistral Nemo 12B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek-R1