Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Phi-3 (Any version)

LM Studio

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Varies
Pricing Model Free / Open

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

LLaVA 1.5 Wins

With an intelligence score of 81/100 vs 65/100, LLaVA 1.5 outperforms Phi-3 (Any version) by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for LLaVA 1.5.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Phi-3 (Any version)
LLaVA 1.5
Context Window
Varies Local
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware limited Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
Unlimited Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Closed source application
  • Large downloads
  • Hardware dependent performance
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths
  • Model Discovery: Built-in search of HuggingFace
  • GGUF Support: Optimized quantized models
  • GPU Offload: Mix CPU/GPU layers
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server

Similar Comparisons