Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Phi-4

A-TIER

GitHub Models

Intelligence Score 89/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 89/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Phi-4 by 4 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Phi-4	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window	128K	200K
Architecture	Transformer	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~80-84%	~88-91%
Release Date	Dec 2024	Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	Varies by Copilot Tier	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Low	Credit-based
Capabilities	Reasoning	Reasoning
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	Unknown
Limitations	Restrictive limits Requires GitHub account Rate limits vary by Copilot tier	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths	Prototyping	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing