Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Phi-4
A-TIERGitHub Models
Intelligence Score
89/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
DeepSeek Coder V2
A-TIEROllama
Intelligence Score
85/100
Context Window
64K tokens
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Phi-4 Wins
With an intelligence score of 89/100 vs 85/100, Phi-4 outperforms DeepSeek Coder V2 by 4 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Phi-4
|
DeepSeek Coder V2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 64K tokens |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Dense Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
Dec 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by Copilot Tier | Hardware limited |
|
Daily Limit
|
Low | Unlimited |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Phi-4
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
Phi-4
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Phi-4
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Gemma 2 9B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Mistral Nemo 12B
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Phi-3.5 Mini
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
GPT-4o
DeepSeek Coder V2
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct