Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Phi-4

A-TIER

GitHub Models

Intelligence Score 89/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

DeepSeek-R1

S-TIER

Chutes.ai

Intelligence Score 97/100
Context Window 64K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

DeepSeek-R1 Wins

With an intelligence score of 97/100 vs 89/100, DeepSeek-R1 outperforms Phi-4 by 8 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Phi-4
DeepSeek-R1
Context Window
128K 64K
Architecture
Transformer Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~92-95%
Release Date
Dec 2024 Jan 2025
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by Copilot Tier Varies (community capacity)
Daily Limit
Low Subject to availability
Capabilities
Reasoning
Reasoning
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
Medium 🐢 Slower (Reasoning)
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 🧠 Complex Reasoning
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Restrictive limits
  • Requires GitHub account
  • Rate limits vary by Copilot tier
  • Availability depends on community GPU donors
  • Speed varies with demand
  • Models may be temporarily unavailable
Key Strengths
  • Prototyping
  • Community-powered GPU network
  • Free access to large open-source models
  • OpenAI-compatible API format

Similar Comparisons

Phi-4
vs
GPT-4o
DeepSeek-R1
vs
GPT-4o
Phi-4
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Phi-4
vs
Mistral Large (24.11)
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Mistral Large (24.11)
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Cohere Command R+
DeepSeek-R1
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct