Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen 2.5 72B

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Command R7B (12-2024)

A-TIER

Cohere

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Qwen 2.5 72B Wins

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 87/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Command R7B (12-2024) by 4 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen 2.5 72B
Command R7B (12-2024)
Context Window
32K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~80-84%
Release Date
Sep-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 20 requests/minute
Daily Limit
Credit-based -
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
72B 7B
Limitations
  • Credits are limited ($1)
  • Decentralized nature may vary latency
  • Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
  • Monthly quota shared across all models
  • 1,000 API calls/month on free tier
  • Commercial use restricted on free plan
Key Strengths
  • Verifiable Inference (verified computing)
  • Low Cost due to decentralized compute
  • Privacy focused
  • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) built-in
  • Enterprise-grade models
  • Embeddings and reranking models

Similar Comparisons