Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.1 70B
A-TIERLepton AI
Intelligence Score
87/100
Context Window
8K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 72B Wins
With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 87/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Llama 3.1 70B by 4 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
Llama 3.1 70B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
32K | 8K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
Sep-Nov 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
âš¡ Fast | âš¡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
72B | 70B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 70B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct