Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
A-TIERChutes.ai
Intelligence Score
88/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 72B Wins
With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 88/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Llama 3.1 70B Instruct by 3 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
32K | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
Sep-Nov 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | Varies (community capacity) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Subject to availability |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Fast | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
72B | 70B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct