Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen 2.5 72B

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

S-TIER

Fireworks AI

Intelligence Score 94/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins

With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 91/100, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct outperforms Qwen 2.5 72B by 3 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen 2.5 72B
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
32K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~88-91%
Release Date
Sep-Nov 2024 Dec 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 600 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
72B 70B
Limitations
  • Credits are limited ($1)
  • Decentralized nature may vary latency
  • Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
  • $1 credit is one-time only
  • Billing account needed for continued use
  • Rate limits apply to free tier
Key Strengths
  • Verifiable Inference (verified computing)
  • Low Cost due to decentralized compute
  • Privacy focused
  • Blazing Fast Inference
  • Fire-Function-v1: Optimized for tool use
  • JSON Mode: Guaranteed structure

Similar Comparisons