Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen 2.5 72B

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Qwen 2.5 72B Wins

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 81/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms LLaVA 1.5 by 10 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen 2.5 72B
LLaVA 1.5
Context Window
32K Local
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~75-79%
Release Date
Sep-Nov 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
Credit-based Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
72B Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Credits are limited ($1)
  • Decentralized nature may vary latency
  • Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths
  • Verifiable Inference (verified computing)
  • Low Cost due to decentralized compute
  • Privacy focused
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server

Similar Comparisons

Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
LLaVA 1.5
vs
DeepSeek V3
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Qwen3 32B