Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen 2.5 72B

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

A-TIER

SambaNova Cloud

Intelligence Score 89/100
Context Window 32k Context
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Qwen 2.5 72B Wins

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 89/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen 2.5 72B
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Context Window
32K 32k Context
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~80-84%
Release Date
Sep-Nov 2024 Sep-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Varies by model
Daily Limit
Credit-based Dependent on credits
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 💻 Code Generation
Model Size
72B 32B
Limitations
  • Credits are limited ($1)
  • Decentralized nature may vary latency
  • Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
  • Free credits are one-time for new users
  • Context window varies by model (8k - 128k)
  • Rate limits apply to free tier
Key Strengths
  • Verifiable Inference (verified computing)
  • Low Cost due to decentralized compute
  • Privacy focused
  • SambaNova SN40L RDU Chip
  • Dataflow Architecture
  • Record-Breaking Speed

Similar Comparisons