Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
TinyLlama
llamafile
Intelligence Score
64/100
Context Window
Local
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 72B Wins
With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 64/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms TinyLlama by 27 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Qwen 2.5 72B.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
TinyLlama
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
32K | Local |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
Sep-Nov 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | Hardware dependent |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Unlimited |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
72B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
TinyLlama
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
TinyLlama
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
TinyLlama
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
TinyLlama
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
TinyLlama
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
TinyLlama
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
TinyLlama
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
TinyLlama
vs
DeepSeek V3
TinyLlama
vs
Qwen3 32B