Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
A-TIERSambaNova Cloud
Intelligence Score
89/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
32k Context
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
A-TIERCloudflare Workers AI
Intelligence Score
80/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Wins
With an intelligence score of 89/100 vs 80/100, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B outperforms Llama 3.1 8B Instruct by 9 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
|
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
32k Context | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
Sep-Nov 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by model | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
Dependent on credits | 10,000 neurons/day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | âš¡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
💻 Code Generation | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
32B | 8B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct