Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
A-TIERSambaNova Cloud
Intelligence Score
89/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
32k Context
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
A-TIERHugging Face Inference
Intelligence Score
82/100
Context Window
128k
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Wins
With an intelligence score of 89/100 vs 82/100, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B outperforms Llama 3.2 11B Vision by 7 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
|
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
32k Context | 128k |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
Sep-Nov 2024 | Sep 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by model | 300 Requests / hour |
|
Daily Limit
|
Dependent on credits | Dependent on global load |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Text
Vision
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
💻 Code Generation | 👁️ Vision & Multimodal |
|
Model Size
|
32B | 11B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct